DT / RESEARCHCAD · 2016–2025

WEALTH MANAGEMENT / 01

The Cash Drag.

What did liquidity cost—and when did it help?

A historical study of cash-like reserves, Canadian stocks and bonds. Explore the balance between money available today and purchasing power tomorrow.

HISTORICAL OUTCOME

Purchasing power over time

Selected portfolio · ending value

Difference vs. 0% cash

Same withdrawals and dates

Worst calendar-year return

Before withdrawals · nominal
Your allocation0% cash · 60/40 baseline

View annual balances
Year-endYour portfolio0% cash baseline

THE TRADE-OFF

Different reserves. Different outcomes.

Same starting wealth, withdrawals and dates as your scenario. Returns and drawdowns exclude withdrawals; balances include them.

Cash-like weightEnding value¹Annualized return²Worst year²Year-end drawdown²Unfunded withdrawals³

¹ Uses your selected display units. ² Nominal investment returns. Drawdown is the largest decline from an earlier year-end peak, including the initial investment. ³ Inflation-adjusted to the start of the selected period.

FROM CHARTS TO DECISIONS

Liquidity has a purpose. Give it a budget.

01

The price of a reserve

This is an opportunity-cost comparison. It does not identify an optimal cash allocation or predict the next decade.

02

Protection is period-specific

Cash helped soften this particular loss. Annual observations miss intrayear stress, including the sharp 2020 market sell-off.

03

Start with spending needs

For an adviser, the practical conversation starts with planned spending, income stability and a client’s capacity to tolerate losses—not an arbitrary cash percentage.

THE WEALTH MANAGEMENT IMPLICATION

Separate near-term commitments from long-term capital.

Use a reserve target tied to actual spending commitments, then review the opportunity cost of keeping additional assets liquid. This model makes that cost visible. It does not test whether drawing from a cash reserve first improves retirement outcomes: withdrawals here come from the whole portfolio before annual rebalancing.

TRANSPARENT BY DESIGN

What this study measures.

Historical scenarios, using ten annual observations per asset. All returns and balances are in Canadian dollars. “Real” means adjusted for Canadian consumer-price inflation; it is not a forecast of a household’s personal cost of living.

Download annual source data ↓
Assets & primary sources

Stocks: Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN). Bonds: Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB). Cash-like: iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR), an investment fund rather than a bank balance.

Annual NAV total returns, with distributions reinvested, transcribed from the 2025 management reports: VCN, PDF page 4, VAB, PDF page 4, and CMR, PDF page 6. Inflation: December all-items CPI, not seasonally adjusted, series v41690973, from the Bank of Canada / Statistics Canada. December 2015 baseline: 126.5 (2002 = 100). Retrieved September 17, 2026. Provider links may later point to newer reports.

Calculation rules

Each year: inflate the requested withdrawal using CPI through the previous December; withdraw at the beginning of the year (limited to available assets); rebalance the remaining assets to the target weights; apply that year’s weighted total return. No contributions. Cash weight stays constant. Real ending value equals nominal value divided by ending CPI / starting CPI. The 0% cash baseline uses the same rules with 60% stocks and 40% bonds.

Fund expenses are already reflected in returns. No additional advisory fees, personal taxes, transaction costs or bid–ask spreads are modeled. Published returns are rounded to two decimal places, so compounded results are approximate.

Limits & next research steps

This is a domestic Canadian portfolio, not a globally diversified wealth-management plan. One historical decade cannot establish a safe withdrawal rate or a future probability of success. Annual data cannot measure the deepest market loss or cash needs within a year. CMR’s fees and investment mandate changed during the sample; this uses the fund’s realized history.

A stronger next study would add monthly total returns, international assets in CAD, account-specific Canadian taxation, advisory fees, and explicit cash-first versus pro-rata withdrawal policies. Test rolling start dates and adverse return sequences before drawing retirement-planning conclusions.

Inspect the underlying annual observations
YearVCN returnVAB returnCMR returnDecember CPIDec.–Dec. inflation